Use Calving-Ease Scores To Monitor And Reduce Dystocia
by Bob Weaber, Ph.D., PAS
Cow-calf Extension Specialist
Kansas State University
The old management adage “If you don’t measure it, you can’t improve it” holds true for many beef production traits. It is especially true for dystocia or calving difficulty. With the spring bull-buying season in full swing, it’s important for producers to review their current data collection scheme and the data they use in selection of bulls to remedy problems in their herd.
Many producers still collect birth weights of calves as part of their performance record collection system. Producers are encouraged to transition to collection of calving-ease scores instead of or in addition to birth weights. Birth weight only accounts for 55-60 percent of the genetic variation in calving-ease. So, selection for reduced birth weight alone won’t improve calving-ease as much as selecting directly for calving-ease.
And since birth weight is strongly correlated with other growth traits, reduction in birth weight is usually associated with decreased growth performance at weaning and yearling. When selecting a service sire for use on virgin heifers, it is recommended to focus on selection of Limousin and Lim-Flex bulls with Calving-Ease EPDs of 11 or greater. If you are using artificial insemination, select bulls with high accuracy Calving-Ease EPDs to further minimize risk of dystocia.
For cow-calf producers, calving-ease is the economically relevant trait associated with dystocia. Economically relevant traits (ERTs) are those that directly generate revenue or incur costs in beef production systems.
In the case of a commercial cow-calf producer, dystocia (or lack of ‘calving-ease’) is what generates costs in a cow herd through direct loss of calves and their dams, increased labor costs, and certainly lower reproductive rates among cows that have experienced dystocia.
Birth weight is an indicator trait. In this case, birth weight provides some information on calving-ease. Birth weight alone doesn’t directly generate revenue or incur costs independent of calving-ease. It’s important to recognize there is an optimal range of birth weights in beef cattle.
Certainly, too heavy of a calf is a problem during delivery of the calf hence our selection, at least historically, for lower birth weights. However, too small of a calf at birth can be problematic as well. This is especially true for winter/early spring-calving herds. During severe cold stress, low body weight calves are more susceptible to hypothermia and subsequent death or disease issues. Indeed, very low birth weight calves in northern latitudes can dramatically reduce survivability for calves born in winter months.
Recording calving-ease scores is easy and should be done at or shortly after birth. The Beef Improvement Federation recommended calving-ease scores are listed here and are in the front of the NCBA IRM red books. Monitoring calving-ease in heifers and cows will allow producers to select sires with optimal calving-ease and moderate levels of birth weight; helping to minimize dystocia.
Calving-ease records may also allow identification of sires that are causing problems. Sire selection for improved calving-ease should focus on Calving-Ease EPD, and for sires of replacement females, Calving-Ease Maternal EPD should be considered. Calving-Ease Maternal describes the genetics associated with the ability of a sire’s daughters to calve without assistance.
Calving-Ease Score – Description
1 – No difficulty/no assistance
2 – Minor difficulty/some assistance
3 – Major difficulty/usually mechanical assistance
4 – Caesarian section or other surgery
5 – Abnormal presentation